The game between Peter Heine Nielsen and Hikaru Nakamura ended in a draw after a fourfold
repetition. Indeed, a threefold repetition normally suffices for a draw, but
Nakamura was so frustrated by the winning chances he had squandered that he
first turned down a draw offer after the second repetition and only returned
the offer when the same position had arisen for the fourth time. After the
opening the game was more or less equal, but Nielsen wasn’t surprised that that
didn’t stop Nakamura from continuing to try. The American grandmaster was rewarded
for his combativeness when Nielsen attempted to shake off the building pressure
with an exchange sacrifice that didn’t do him much good. Soon his position was
lost and only a miracle could save him. That miracle Nakamura took care of when
he let his rook be locked up on h6. Suddenly White was out of danger and he
might even consider playing for a win. In fact, that was Nakamura’s last hope
and when Nielsen realized that such a winning attempt was highly risky the
inevitable end of the game was a draw.
Peter Svidler and Fabiano Caruana also had an adventurous afternoon. The
Italian number one was allowed to show a novelty in a Ruy Lopez with 6…Bc5 that
he had prepared some time ago. His 18…Bd7 was an improvement over 18…c4, which
was played in a game Kasparov-Topalov in 1997. The novelty didn’t bring Caruana
much joy as one move on he made a losing mistake! He should have played 19…Nf5
as after 19…Rb6 20.f5! he was in deep trouble. But the drama wasn’t over yet.
With 24.Ba4 Svidler turned a winning position (which he would have had after
24.Bxd5) into a dubious position in which Black was winning. Or at least seemed
to be winning with two extra pawns. But the game miraculously ended in a draw
and, moreover, in the post-mortem the players failed to find a forced win for
Black!
Boris Gelfand and Wesley So tested each other judgement in a complicated
Meran. The Israeli grandmaster tried to exploit the weakness of the white
squares on the queenside, but his opponent played precisely and the position
became totally equal. On move 25 Gelfand offered a draw and So had no
objections.
Ljubomir Ljubojevic and Anish Giri had a lively discussion in the post-mortem
about the correctness of pawn sacrifice that the young Dutch grandmaster had
gone for to complicate matters in a solid Meran position. Ljubojevic was
convinced that White’s position was to be preferred, but the lines they looked
at and the verdict of the computer supported Giri’s judgement. Black had
sufficient compensation and ended up in the driver’s seat after White’s knight
manoeuvre Ne1-c2, which invited 23…Bxg2 and wild complications that favoured
Black. Ljubojevic believed White would have had a clear advantage if he had
gone 21.d5, but in that case 21…Rac8 gives Black good play. Giri got a
wonderful attack and after the neat 29…Ne4 the fight was essentially over.
The longest game of the day, lasting almost
six hours and 88 moves, was the fight between Loek van Wely and David Howell. The tough tussle ended in another disappointment
for Van Wely. The Dutch grandmaster played the middlegame very well and had a
technically winning position for a good part of the game, but in the end he
failed to capitalize on his opponent’s mistakes and had to settle for a draw.